EE-LV issueshttps://git.gsi.de/groups/EE-LV/-/issues2018-08-27T14:48:17Zhttps://git.gsi.de/EE-LV/CSPP/CSPP_MessageMaker/-/issues/26Class for ReturnMsg not listed2018-08-27T14:48:17ZHolger Brandh.brand@gsi.deClass for ReturnMsg not listedIt seems that only actor classes from the CSPP_Core are listed for selection of an ancestor Message class.
Expert mode lists only one more actor class. Deactivation of expert mode leaves the list of possible actor class empty.It seems that only actor classes from the CSPP_Core are listed for selection of an ancestor Message class.
Expert mode lists only one more actor class. Deactivation of expert mode leaves the list of possible actor class empty.Dennis NeidherrDennis Neidherrhttps://git.gsi.de/EE-LV/CSPP/CSPP_MessageMaker/-/issues/27Action-VI name has to be saved in xml file2018-09-25T13:06:15ZDennis NeidherrAction-VI name has to be saved in xml fileFor return messages an invers search algorithm is implemented. Unfortunatly we have several messages in the system which do not follow the naming convention and therefor the MM will not find the corresponding action VI. An idea would be ...For return messages an invers search algorithm is implemented. Unfortunatly we have several messages in the system which do not follow the naming convention and therefor the MM will not find the corresponding action VI. An idea would be to ask the user for the correct name and save everything in the xml file of the message.Dennis NeidherrDennis Neidherrhttps://git.gsi.de/EE-LV/CSPP/CSPP_MessageMaker/-/issues/29Abstract Message with no class constant on blockdiagram2018-10-01T07:55:02ZHolger Brandh.brand@gsi.deAbstract Message with no class constant on blockdiagramError 1055 occurrs in FindAllMessages.vi, if Msg:Do.vi has **no** class constant on its blockdiagramm.
This can happen if an abstract message was created manually by developer, calling only the acestors Do.vi.
Abstract messages obvious...Error 1055 occurrs in FindAllMessages.vi, if Msg:Do.vi has **no** class constant on its blockdiagramm.
This can happen if an abstract message was created manually by developer, calling only the acestors Do.vi.
Abstract messages obviously need special treatment.https://git.gsi.de/EE-LV/CSPP/TASCA/UTCS/-/issues/4BeamControlGUI:ChopperStatus inverted2019-03-25T08:59:14ZHolger Brandh.brand@gsi.deBeamControlGUI:ChopperStatus invertedThe display of Chopper status is displayed incorrectly (inverted)
Temporary solution: invert SV UTCS_AE:Chopper_output via scaling.The display of Chopper status is displayed incorrectly (inverted)
Temporary solution: invert SV UTCS_AE:Chopper_output via scaling.https://git.gsi.de/EE-LV/CSPP/TASCA/UTCS/-/issues/5Interlock reason logging2019-03-25T08:59:04ZHolger Brandh.brand@gsi.deInterlock reason loggingInterlock reason should be logged to historical database.Interlock reason should be logged to historical database.Holger Brandh.brand@gsi.deHolger Brandh.brand@gsi.dehttps://git.gsi.de/EE-LV/CS/PHELIX/PH_Devices/-/issues/5PH_AWG100d: Button "Send Wfm" mechanical action2019-04-10T16:09:21ZUdo Eisenbarthu.eisenbarth@gsi.dePH_AWG100d: Button "Send Wfm" mechanical actionIch bin nicht ganz sicher aber evtl sit die mechanical action des "Send wfm" buttons nicht richtig. Entweder er soll direkt nach dem Drücken wieder "herausspringen" oder nahc Beendigung des "Send" Vorgangs.Ich bin nicht ganz sicher aber evtl sit die mechanical action des "Send wfm" buttons nicht richtig. Entweder er soll direkt nach dem Drücken wieder "herausspringen" oder nahc Beendigung des "Send" Vorgangs.https://git.gsi.de/EE-LV/CSPP/CSPP_DN/CSPP_FPGA/-/issues/1External Trigger2019-05-23T08:54:18ZDennis NeidherrExternal TriggerI think after sending a new pattern to the card, the external trigger flag is always set to on, so that in the GUI one has to switch it on and off again.
But this needs to be confirmed.I think after sending a new pattern to the card, the external trigger flag is always set to on, so that in the GUI one has to switch it on and off again.
But this needs to be confirmed.Dennis NeidherrDennis Neidherrhttps://git.gsi.de/EE-LV/CSPP/CSPP_Core/-/issues/7Publish error flag and complete error2019-10-11T11:40:22ZDennis NeidherrPublish error flag and complete errorPublish the error flag as well as the error cluster and move the PublishError VI and all associated functionalities to the BaseActor level.Publish the error flag as well as the error cluster and move the PublishError VI and all associated functionalities to the BaseActor level.Dennis NeidherrDennis Neidherrhttps://git.gsi.de/EE-LV/CSPP/CSPP_Core/-/issues/8Automatic Stopping of StartActor2019-07-09T13:00:22ZDennis NeidherrAutomatic Stopping of StartActorRight now he stopps himself if he gots a handle last acq msg from the first nested actor in an alphabetical list.
This works but seems rather unintuitively. Wouldn't it be better to include a boolean flag for all nested actors of the sta...Right now he stopps himself if he gots a handle last acq msg from the first nested actor in an alphabetical list.
This works but seems rather unintuitively. Wouldn't it be better to include a boolean flag for all nested actors of the start actor indicating if this is a "Main-Actor" which should stop also the StartActor?Dennis NeidherrDennis Neidherrhttps://git.gsi.de/EE-LV/CSPP/CSPP_DN/CSPP_FPGA/-/issues/2PPG GUI Save button greyed out2019-06-17T11:05:48ZDennis NeidherrPPG GUI Save button greyed outI think the save button stays to be greyed out after a file was openedI think the save button stays to be greyed out after a file was openedDennis NeidherrDennis Neidherrhttps://git.gsi.de/EE-LV/CSPP/CSPP_DN/CSPP_FPGA/-/issues/4PPG save files2019-06-17T11:05:29ZDennis NeidherrPPG save filesmaybe the ending .ppg would be good?maybe the ending .ppg would be good?Dennis NeidherrDennis Neidherrhttps://git.gsi.de/EE-LV/CSPP/CSPP_DN/CSPP_FPGA/-/issues/5Asterix in title if pattern or times change2019-06-17T11:05:39ZDennis NeidherrAsterix in title if pattern or times changePut an asterix behind the file name if someone changed the timining or output tablePut an asterix behind the file name if someone changed the timining or output tableDennis NeidherrDennis Neidherrhttps://git.gsi.de/EE-LV/CSPP/CSPP_DN/CSPP_FPGA/-/issues/6Keybinds for functions2019-06-17T11:05:20ZDennis NeidherrKeybinds for functionsAdd keybinds for FPGA functionsAdd keybinds for FPGA functionsDennis NeidherrDennis Neidherrhttps://git.gsi.de/EE-LV/CSPP/CSPP_DN/CSPP_FPGA/-/issues/7Add a digital wafveform to show pattern2019-06-17T11:05:12ZDennis NeidherrAdd a digital wafveform to show patternCheck how much work this is.
It would help to see how the pattern really loooks likeCheck how much work this is.
It would help to see how the pattern really loooks likeDennis NeidherrDennis Neidherrhttps://git.gsi.de/EE-LV/CSPP/CSPP_DN/CSPP_FPGA/-/issues/8What to do if save or load was canceled?2019-06-17T11:04:41ZDennis NeidherrWhat to do if save or load was canceled?In this case the GUI has some problems!In this case the GUI has some problems!Dennis NeidherrDennis Neidherrhttps://git.gsi.de/EE-LV/CSPP/CSPP_Core/-/issues/11CSPP_GUIActor:Connect Set-PVs.vi2019-10-09T07:20:30ZSoenke BeckCSPP_GUIActor:Connect Set-PVs.viError=1 occurrs if empty message in Set-Message array. (Set Variant Attribute)
Please report error, or ignore such elements and generate warning.Error=1 occurrs if empty message in Set-Message array. (Set Variant Attribute)
Please report error, or ignore such elements and generate warning.https://git.gsi.de/EE-LV/CSPP/s2gt/CSPP_S2GT/-/issues/1LS218 Integration2021-04-22T11:20:48ZHolger Brandh.brand@gsi.deLS218 IntegrationMake LS218 communication via RS232 working with LabVIEW Driver/actor´.Make LS218 communication via RS232 working with LabVIEW Driver/actor´.https://git.gsi.de/EE-LV/CSPP/CSPP_DSC/-/issues/2CSPP_DSCAlarmViewer filter priorities2020-03-16T08:45:30ZHolger Brandh.brand@gsi.deCSPP_DSCAlarmViewer filter prioritiesSet priority filter for the AlarmViewer to 1:599 (Severity:Notice)by default.Set priority filter for the AlarmViewer to 1:599 (Severity:Notice)by default.Holger Brandh.brand@gsi.deHolger Brandh.brand@gsi.dehttps://git.gsi.de/EE-LV/CSPP/CSPP_Core/-/issues/13Introspection Core.vi2020-06-15T15:43:04ZHolger Brandh.brand@gsi.deIntrospection Core.viRequire descendant classes to override this dynamic dispatch VI.Require descendant classes to override this dynamic dispatch VI.https://git.gsi.de/EE-LV/CSPP/cspp-template/-/issues/1Error after installation2020-05-28T13:19:14ZUdo Eisenbarthu.eisenbarth@gsi.deError after installationAfter installation (according to docs). The error list shows a vi with errors:
CSPP_SystemMonitor_SV.lvlib:SystemMonitor_CPU-Load:
Invalid shared variabel configuration
The target deos not support hosting shared variable project items ...After installation (according to docs). The error list shows a vi with errors:
CSPP_SystemMonitor_SV.lvlib:SystemMonitor_CPU-Load:
Invalid shared variabel configuration
The target deos not support hosting shared variable project items of this type.
Did I forget to install something?