Not clear on how to apply the naming rule for a Acquisition "_status" value-items if the status counts for all other value-items.
We just realized that on our discussion on PPOS:
https://git.acc.gsi.de/awalter/FESA-API-Comments/pulls/1#issuecomment-21307
E.g. if the Aquisition Property has 10 value-items, it does not make much sense to add another [value-item-name]_status
value-item for each single item, if these extra-items anyhow all would contain the same data.
Specifically for PPOS we decided to not send the data at all if it might be corrupt. However, for other FESA classes, this might be relevant.