Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 3d1f3187 authored by girish's avatar girish
Browse files

Check in a fix from Johann Lombardi about missing get_bh().

And few small changes as per the upstream changes.
b=10657
parent e54d96e4
No related merge requests found
......@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ Index: linux-2.6.16.53-0.16/fs/jbd/commit.c
int barrier_done = 0;
if (is_journal_aborted(journal))
@@ -118,21 +123,34 @@ static int journal_write_commit_record(j
@@ -118,21 +123,35 @@ static int journal_write_commit_record(j
bh = jh2bh(descriptor);
......@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ Index: linux-2.6.16.53-0.16/fs/jbd/commit.c
- JBUFFER_TRACE(descriptor, "write commit block");
+ JBUFFER_TRACE(descriptor, "submit commit block");
+ lock_buffer(bh);
+ get_bh(bh);
+
set_buffer_dirty(bh);
- if (journal->j_flags & JFS_BARRIER) {
......@@ -82,7 +83,7 @@ Index: linux-2.6.16.53-0.16/fs/jbd/commit.c
/* is it possible for another commit to fail at roughly
* the same time as this one? If so, we don't want to
* trust the barrier flag in the super, but instead want
@@ -153,12 +171,84 @@ static int journal_write_commit_record(j
@@ -153,12 +172,84 @@ static int journal_write_commit_record(j
clear_buffer_ordered(bh);
set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
set_buffer_dirty(bh);
......@@ -162,16 +163,16 @@ Index: linux-2.6.16.53-0.16/fs/jbd/commit.c
+ char *addr;
+ __u32 checksum;
+
+ addr = kmap(page);
+ addr = kmap_atomic(page, KM_USER0);
+ checksum = crc32_be(crc32_sum,
+ (void *)(addr + offset_in_page(bh->b_data)),
+ bh->b_size);
+ kunmap(page);
+ kunmap_atomic(addr, KM_USER0);
+ return checksum;
}
/*
@@ -184,6 +274,8 @@ void journal_commit_transaction(journal_
@@ -184,6 +275,8 @@ void journal_commit_transaction(journal_
int first_tag = 0;
int tag_flag;
int i;
......@@ -180,7 +181,7 @@ Index: linux-2.6.16.53-0.16/fs/jbd/commit.c
/*
* First job: lock down the current transaction and wait for
@@ -395,37 +487,14 @@ write_out_data:
@@ -395,37 +488,14 @@ write_out_data:
}
/*
......@@ -224,7 +225,7 @@ Index: linux-2.6.16.53-0.16/fs/jbd/commit.c
spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
if (err)
@@ -598,6 +667,16 @@ write_out_data:
@@ -598,6 +668,16 @@ write_out_data:
start_journal_io:
for (i = 0; i < bufs; i++) {
struct buffer_head *bh = wbuf[i];
......@@ -241,7 +242,7 @@ Index: linux-2.6.16.53-0.16/fs/jbd/commit.c
lock_buffer(bh);
clear_buffer_dirty(bh);
set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
@@ -614,6 +693,23 @@ start_journal_io:
@@ -614,6 +694,23 @@ start_journal_io:
}
}
......@@ -265,7 +266,7 @@ Index: linux-2.6.16.53-0.16/fs/jbd/commit.c
/* Lo and behold: we have just managed to send a transaction to
the log. Before we can commit it, wait for the IO so far to
complete. Control buffers being written are on the
@@ -712,9 +808,15 @@ wait_for_iobuf:
@@ -712,9 +809,15 @@ wait_for_iobuf:
}
jbd_debug(3, "JBD: commit phase 6\n");
......@@ -371,7 +372,7 @@ Index: linux-2.6.16.53-0.16/fs/jbd/recovery.c
+ unsigned long *next_log_block, __u32 *crc32_sum)
+{
+ int i, num_blks, err;
+ unsigned io_block;
+ unsigned long io_block;
+ struct buffer_head *obh;
+
+ num_blks = count_tags(bh, journal->j_blocksize);
......@@ -384,7 +385,7 @@ Index: linux-2.6.16.53-0.16/fs/jbd/recovery.c
+ err = jread(&obh, journal, io_block);
+ if (err) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "JBD: IO error %d recovering block "
+ "%u in log\n", err, io_block);
+ "%lu in log\n", err, io_block);
+ return 1;
+ } else {
+ *crc32_sum = crc32_be(*crc32_sum, (void *)obh->b_data,
......@@ -422,10 +423,10 @@ Index: linux-2.6.16.53-0.16/fs/jbd/recovery.c
+ if (calc_chksums(journal, bh,
+ &next_log_block,
+ &crc32_sum)) {
+ brelse(bh);
+ put_bh(bh);
+ break;
+ }
+ brelse(bh);
+ put_bh(bh);
+ continue;
+ }
+
......
......@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ Index: linux-2.6.18.8/fs/jbd/commit.c
int barrier_done = 0;
if (is_journal_aborted(journal))
@@ -119,21 +124,34 @@ static int journal_write_commit_record(j
@@ -119,21 +124,35 @@ static int journal_write_commit_record(j
bh = jh2bh(descriptor);
......@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ Index: linux-2.6.18.8/fs/jbd/commit.c
- JBUFFER_TRACE(descriptor, "write commit block");
+ JBUFFER_TRACE(descriptor, "submit commit block");
+ lock_buffer(bh);
+ get_bh(bh);
+
set_buffer_dirty(bh);
- if (journal->j_flags & JFS_BARRIER) {
......@@ -82,7 +83,7 @@ Index: linux-2.6.18.8/fs/jbd/commit.c
/* is it possible for another commit to fail at roughly
* the same time as this one? If so, we don't want to
* trust the barrier flag in the super, but instead want
@@ -154,12 +172,70 @@ static int journal_write_commit_record(j
@@ -154,12 +173,70 @@ static int journal_write_commit_record(j
clear_buffer_ordered(bh);
set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
set_buffer_dirty(bh);
......@@ -157,7 +158,7 @@ Index: linux-2.6.18.8/fs/jbd/commit.c
}
void journal_do_submit_data(struct buffer_head **wbuf, int bufs)
@@ -273,6 +349,20 @@ write_out_data:
@@ -273,6 +350,20 @@ write_out_data:
journal_do_submit_data(wbuf, bufs);
}
......@@ -167,18 +168,18 @@ Index: linux-2.6.18.8/fs/jbd/commit.c
+ char *addr;
+ __u32 checksum;
+
+ addr = kmap(page);
+ addr = kmap_atomic(page, KM_USER0);
+ checksum = crc32_be(crc32_sum,
+ (void *)(addr + offset_in_page(bh->b_data)),
+ bh->b_size);
+ kunmap(page);
+ kunmap_atomic(addr, KM_USER0);
+ return checksum;
+}
+
/*
* journal_commit_transaction
*
@@ -296,6 +386,8 @@ void journal_commit_transaction(journal_
@@ -296,6 +387,8 @@ void journal_commit_transaction(journal_
int first_tag = 0;
int tag_flag;
int i;
......@@ -187,7 +188,7 @@ Index: linux-2.6.18.8/fs/jbd/commit.c
/*
* First job: lock down the current transaction and wait for
@@ -439,38 +531,14 @@ void journal_commit_transaction(journal_
@@ -439,38 +532,14 @@ void journal_commit_transaction(journal_
journal_submit_data_buffers(journal, commit_transaction);
/*
......@@ -232,7 +233,7 @@ Index: linux-2.6.18.8/fs/jbd/commit.c
spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
if (err)
@@ -643,6 +711,16 @@ void journal_commit_transaction(journal_
@@ -643,6 +712,16 @@ void journal_commit_transaction(journal_
start_journal_io:
for (i = 0; i < bufs; i++) {
struct buffer_head *bh = wbuf[i];
......@@ -249,7 +250,7 @@ Index: linux-2.6.18.8/fs/jbd/commit.c
lock_buffer(bh);
clear_buffer_dirty(bh);
set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
@@ -659,6 +737,23 @@ start_journal_io:
@@ -659,6 +738,23 @@ start_journal_io:
}
}
......@@ -273,7 +274,7 @@ Index: linux-2.6.18.8/fs/jbd/commit.c
/* Lo and behold: we have just managed to send a transaction to
the log. Before we can commit it, wait for the IO so far to
complete. Control buffers being written are on the
@@ -757,9 +852,15 @@ wait_for_iobuf:
@@ -757,9 +853,15 @@ wait_for_iobuf:
}
jbd_debug(3, "JBD: commit phase 6\n");
......@@ -379,7 +380,7 @@ Index: linux-2.6.18.8/fs/jbd/recovery.c
+ unsigned long *next_log_block, __u32 *crc32_sum)
+{
+ int i, num_blks, err;
+ unsigned io_block;
+ unsigned long io_block;
+ struct buffer_head *obh;
+
+ num_blks = count_tags(bh, journal->j_blocksize);
......@@ -392,7 +393,7 @@ Index: linux-2.6.18.8/fs/jbd/recovery.c
+ err = jread(&obh, journal, io_block);
+ if (err) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "JBD: IO error %d recovering block "
+ "%u in log\n", err, io_block);
+ "%lu in log\n", err, io_block);
+ return 1;
+ } else {
+ *crc32_sum = crc32_be(*crc32_sum, (void *)obh->b_data,
......@@ -430,10 +431,10 @@ Index: linux-2.6.18.8/fs/jbd/recovery.c
+ if (calc_chksums(journal, bh,
+ &next_log_block,
+ &crc32_sum)) {
+ brelse(bh);
+ put_bh(bh);
+ break;
+ }
+ brelse(bh);
+ put_bh(bh);
+ continue;
+ }
+
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment