Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 55f1dc8d authored by Oleg Drokin's avatar Oleg Drokin
Browse files

r=shadow,umka

b=14257

Do not include LdLM_FLOCK locks into ldlm_pool sanity calculations.
parent a94af686
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -478,6 +478,13 @@ Details : On SLES10/PPC, fs.h includes idr.h which requires BITS_PER_LONG to
be defined. Add a hack in mkfs_lustre.c to work around this compile
issue.
Severity : normal
Bugzilla : 14257
Description: LASSERT on MDS when client holding flock lock dies
Details : ldlm pool logic depends on number of granted locks equal to
number of released locks which is not true for flock locks, so
just exclude such locks from consideration.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2007-12-07 Cluster File Systems, Inc. <info@clusterfs.com>
......
......@@ -667,7 +667,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ldlm_pool_fini);
void ldlm_pool_add(struct ldlm_pool *pl, struct ldlm_lock *lock)
{
/* FLOCK locks are special in a sense that they are almost never
* cancelled, instead special kind of lock is used to drop them.
* also there is no LRU for flock locks, so no point in tracking
* them anyway */
if (lock->l_resource->lr_type == LDLM_FLOCK)
return;
ENTRY;
atomic_inc(&pl->pl_granted);
atomic_inc(&pl->pl_grant_rate);
atomic_inc(&pl->pl_grant_speed);
......@@ -686,6 +694,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ldlm_pool_add);
void ldlm_pool_del(struct ldlm_pool *pl, struct ldlm_lock *lock)
{
if (lock->l_resource->lr_type == LDLM_FLOCK)
return;
ENTRY;
LASSERT(atomic_read(&pl->pl_granted) > 0);
atomic_dec(&pl->pl_granted);
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment